In this case, the gold would be your hard-earned cash, and the hills would be your pocketbook.

It looks like maybe South Dakota bureaucrats are looking to get a piece of the online downloadable content cash withHB 1017. Game Politics breaks it down for us:

Article image

…a tax at the same rate as that imposed upon sales of tangible personal property in this state upon the gross receipts of all sales, leases, or rentals of any product transferred electronically.

Ugh. Let’s hope they’re not really looking at taxing DLC. I don’t want to pay tax on virtual horse armor that I bought for my not-real horse. That’s a bunch of horsesh*t.

Battlefield 6 aiming RPG at a helicopter

AsGame Politicspoints out, other state’s lawmakers could easily fall in line with this, each wanting their own piece of the DLC pie.

What do you think? Should the man be able to tax us on downloadable content?

BO7 key art

yordles animation still image

Destiny 2 Solstice 2025 armor

Hell is Us gameplay reveal

Black Ops 6 Season 5 Multiplayer Ransack Mode

Tekken Tag Tournament 2: a black and white Jin and Heihachi stand back-to-back.

PEAK Bing Bong plushie

GigabyteMon